You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Using the stack_plot() feature and experiencing some strange behaviour, I went to the aggregating_variables_and_plotting_with_negative_values tutorial notebook (#198) to see check whether I was doing something wrong.
I noticed that the test data are a bit ... counter-intuitive. Is this dataset based on real scenario data, or just completely made up?
Specifically:
Units/values are not in line with actual global data
Is 'Emissions|CO2|Agg' supposed to be agriculture?
Why are specifically 'Emissions|CO2|Energy|BECCS' both positive and negative? I would expect this variable in particular to be negative-only...
Is this dataset based on real scenario data, or just completely made up?
Completely made up, can edit however makes sense to you. We just chose the data to make sure the features we cared about all worked (e.g. it could handle timeseries which were only positive, only negative, started positive then went negative, started positive then went negative then went positive again).
Using the
stack_plot()
feature and experiencing some strange behaviour, I went to theaggregating_variables_and_plotting_with_negative_values
tutorial notebook (#198) to see check whether I was doing something wrong.I noticed that the test data are a bit ... counter-intuitive. Is this dataset based on real scenario data, or just completely made up?
Specifically:
'Emissions|CO2|Agg'
supposed to be agriculture?'Emissions|CO2|Energy|BECCS'
both positive and negative? I would expect this variable in particular to be negative-only...@rossursino @znicholls, any comments?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: