Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Task]: Evaluate Google Groups ADR #1150

Closed
btabaska opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

[Task]: Evaluate Google Groups ADR #1150

btabaska opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
community project: grants.gov Grants.gov Modernization tickets refinement

Comments

@btabaska
Copy link
Collaborator

btabaska commented Feb 6, 2024

Summary

Conduct an evaluation of the Architectural Decision Record (ADR) for using Google Groups versus GitHub for community boards and calendar events.

Acceptance criteria

  • A comprehensive review of the current ADR is completed, noting any pros and cons of using Google Groups versus GitHub.
  • Community feedback is gathered and incorporated into the evaluation.
  • A recommendation is made based on the evaluation, including any necessary steps for implementation.
  • The final decision is documented and shared with the community.
@btabaska
Copy link
Collaborator Author

btabaska commented Feb 6, 2024

Note: This should receive input from comms team

@sumiat
Copy link
Contributor

sumiat commented Mar 19, 2024

@sumiat sumiat moved this from Icebox to Sprint Ready in Simpler.Grants.gov Product Backlog Apr 15, 2024
@mxk0 mxk0 moved this from Todo to Icebox in Simpler.Grants.gov Product Backlog Oct 10, 2024
@margaretspring margaretspring removed this from the Open source - Enhancements and fast follow milestone Oct 22, 2024
@mxk0 mxk0 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community project: grants.gov Grants.gov Modernization tickets refinement
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants