You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While writing a test for the WorldbuilderApp, I got an error at ln 288 in source/world.cc as Inconsistent input. Please check whether the radius in the sperhical coordiantes is consistent with the radius of the planet as defined in the program that uses the Geodynamic World Builder. Depth = 0, radius = 6.371e+06, point = 5.77211e+06 -2.69158e+06 -166773, radius-point.norm() = -9.31323e-10
This residual radius norm is quite low and this error was circumvented using the option -ldcc by @MFraters . Maybe we can add this option as default.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The tester now has -ldcc on by default, which should solve the problem I think. Let me know if you think it should be the default in all cases. My worry with that is that it becomes kind of useless, because you would need to turn this option, which no one really now about, manually on. We could improve the message to tell about a way to overwrite this assert.
While writing a test for the WorldbuilderApp, I got an error at ln 288 in
source/world.cc
asInconsistent input. Please check whether the radius in the sperhical coordiantes is consistent with the radius of the planet as defined in the program that uses the Geodynamic World Builder. Depth = 0, radius = 6.371e+06, point = 5.77211e+06 -2.69158e+06 -166773, radius-point.norm() = -9.31323e-10
This residual radius norm is quite low and this error was circumvented using the option
-ldcc
by @MFraters . Maybe we can add this option as default.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: