Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

running BAT.py on already execute simulations #38

Open
amara86 opened this issue Aug 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

running BAT.py on already execute simulations #38

amara86 opened this issue Aug 14, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@amara86
Copy link

amara86 commented Aug 14, 2024

Hi,
I have already executed simulations for my membrane protein complexes, I have over 30 complexes. I have executed relative binding affinities and now want to execute absolute binding free energy calculations. Is there a way, I can use the same simulation data to execute BAT.py?
Regards,
Amara

@GHeinzelmann
Copy link
Owner

GHeinzelmann commented Aug 15, 2024

Hi, and thanks for your interest in the BAT code. In theory yes, but that would require some workaround to make it work. You could use your equilibrated complex and membrane without water as a starting point, treat the membrane molecules as cobinders, and then solvate everything again in the BAT workflow. But I have never tested something like this.

@ErikZhang-9762
Copy link

Hi,Is it possible to control add solvents on the top and bottom sides of the membrane in the BAT workflow? Perhaps using parameterized parm7 and rst7 files as a starting point for input is an option?

@GHeinzelmann
Copy link
Owner

I think so, if you set the buffers on the x and y axes as 0 in the BAT input file, and the value you want for the z buffer, then it will solvate the system only on the z axis. But I am not sure about using parm7 and rst7 files directly, you could extract the membrane+protein+ligand coordinates from these files using cpptraj and then rebuild the systems with the new buffers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants