-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Jam specific clients #329
Comments
I’ve never tried deauthing specific client, only specific AP on specific channel. |
It’s possible, I’ve done it before while running tests. When I was writing v3 I was implementing that feature, but when I noticed the original fluxion didn’t have it I stopped. |
I hope the original fluxion can have a specific user jam for portal attacks.. |
My mistake, it's possible using aircrack instead of mdk3, i am used to mdk3 so i didn't realize i once tried aircrack for this purpuse. @MPX4132 Already marked this topic as Enhancement so it will be added eventually. |
I've done specific user jam by executing aireplay-ng... On captive portal attack is on going i close the Jamming window then open another terminal window execute airudump-ng monitor the AP client you want to hack then open another terminal window and execute aireplay-ng select specific client to jam ;) aireplay-ng -0 0 -a 00:0F:66:XX:XX:XX -c 00:0F:70:XX:XX:XX wlan0 |
Sorry i mean airodump-ng |
Hi! |
+1 Maybe it should decrease router's channel change rate due to too many deauth packages being sent. |
@rodrigogs I've already tweaked the deauthentication time, from constant on, to 3 seconds of deauthentication and 7 of downtime, or something like that. The fact is all devices differ in their behavior. Some devices connect super slowly, some access points take their sweet time processing a connection request. Some freak out when they detect all the clients disconnecting and correlate that to heavy traffic or something and change channels. It's really trial-and-error when it comes to deauthentication. |
Dumb question: what would be the advantage of jamming a specific client on a target AP, while leaving the others undisturbed? |
@voltaire1694 I think jamming a specific client could be a type of "spear phishing." Target the least tech savvy users, since they're the ones less likely to suspect of a potential intrusion. That's the only thing I can think of and why I didn't close this feature request. |
Wouldn't targeting also keep the routers intrusion detection from triggering a channel hop or some other type protection? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
need english capcitive portals for all routers like tenda zte huawei etc |
When you jam, you're jamming a frequency and not a specific client. |
Helloo every one..Can i request? On Captive Portal attack the jamming is all client, can i request to have
a selection? 1 client or 2, 3, all or to select mac of a client to jam? not all client so that not obviously hack
:)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: