Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uncaught HIRS outliers in HIRS-IASI matchups in new harmonisation #365

Open
gerritholl opened this issue Jan 17, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@gerritholl
Copy link
Contributor

In the January 2019 harmonisation run, there is a small number of HIRS radiances getting through that are bad:

image

This was not the case in the October 2018 run:

image

I can't think of anything that's changed in the harmonisation processing for HIRS-IASI matchups (which were always unfiltered), so it must be something else.

It affects 0.03% of the HIRS data, all from a handful of orbits:

In [66]: with printoptions(linewidth=250):
    ...:     print(numpy.unique(ds2["time2"].isel(M=nm2>2e-12).values.astype("M8[h]")))
    ...:
['2013-03-20T06' '2013-03-20T07' '2014-03-26T06' '2014-03-26T07' '2014-03-26T08' '2014-03-26T14' '2014-03-26T15' '2014-04-09T06' '2014-04-09T07']

In the matchup data from October, no data occur at those times:

In [87]: ds1.assign_coords(M=ds1["time2"]).sel(M="2013-03-20T06").dims["M"]
Out[87]: 0

In [88]: ds1.assign_coords(M=ds1["time2"]).sel(M="2013-03-20T07").dims["M"]
Out[88]: 0

In [89]: ds1.assign_coords(M=ds1["time2"]).sel(M="2013-03-20T08").dims["M"]
Out[89]: 0

In [90]: ds1.assign_coords(M=ds1["time2"]).sel(M="2014-03-26T07").dims["M"]
Out[90]: 0

So it looks like there has been a regression...

@jmittaz
Copy link
Contributor

jmittaz commented Jul 31, 2019

This may have been solved in pull request #386 where extra filtering has been added to typhon

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants