Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 25, 2024. It is now read-only.

fix apply patch to fork #1

Merged

Conversation

DylanDylann
Copy link

@DylanDylann DylanDylann commented Oct 17, 2023

Details

  • This PR will apply all the changes in the patch file to the fork package

Fixed Issues

$ Expensify/App#28797
PROPOSAL: Expensify/App#28797 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open app => Request money => Choose "Distance" tab
  2. Add more than one waypoint
  3. Use drag-and-drop to reorder waypoints
  4. Make sure it work as normal
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Open app => Request money => Choose "Distance" tab
  2. Add more than one waypoint
  3. Use drag-and-drop to reorder waypoints
  4. Make sure it work as normal
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-chrome-money.mp4
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screencast.from.18-10-2023.23.15.31.webm
MacOS: Desktop

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link

@DylanDylann please use @Expensify/pullerbear to assign a C+ when the PR is ready

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

DylanDylann commented Oct 18, 2023

@hayata-suenaga

please use @Expensify/pullerbear to assign a C+ when the PR is ready

Sorry, I cannot do this, can you help me, please

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link

ah I completely forgot that this is a new repository. thank you for reminding me of that 😅

I gonna ask some C+ to review this PR 👍

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

@allroundexperts just removed all the dist files. Please help check.

Comment on lines 297 to 303
if (!handle) {
if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production') {
invariant(false, 'Touch sensor unable to find drag handle');
} else {
invariant(false);
}
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

invariant(false, process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production' ? 'Touch sensor unable to find drag handle' : undefined)

Copy link
Author

@DylanDylann DylanDylann Oct 23, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, what do you mean here?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@allroundexperts updated PR based on your suggestion code

function startPendingDrag(
actions: PreDragActions,
point: Position,
target,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm... we should type target as well.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey, to type it you can check the original PR, which was used to create the patch file.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @kosmydel. @allroundexperts Just add type to the event, handle params. Let`s review it. Thanks

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@allroundexperts friendly bump in case you miss it

@@ -437,7 +439,12 @@ export default function useSensorMarshal({
}),
[contextId, lockAPI, registry, store],
);

const findClosestDragHandle = useCallback(
function (event: Event): ?DraggableId {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not how typing works I think. It should be: function (event: Event): DraggableId {} instead.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

because I found a lot of parts in this repo that use this. or example:

const findClosestDraggableId = useCallback(
(event: Event): ?DraggableId =>
findClosestDraggableIdFromEvent(contextId, event),
[contextId],
);

So what do you think about it?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you tested this and can confirm that this works?

Copy link
Author

@DylanDylann DylanDylann Oct 26, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah. When creating this fork PR, I tried creating dist files and adding use it in Expensify node_modules, then testing it in the distance request feature, there was no error occurs

Screencast.from.18-10-2023.23.15.31.webm

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can double-check to confirm it

Copy link

@kosmydel kosmydel Oct 26, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of manually changing the node_modules you can just add it in Expensify by using npm i <local path to the packed library>.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kosmydel thanks for your information

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you tested this and can confirm that this works?

@allroundexperts Just to confirm that it works well from my side. If you tested and did not encounter any error, please go to next step.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link

is this ready for another round of review @DylanDylann ?

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

@hayata-suenaga yeah. I ve requested C+ to review

@allroundexperts
Copy link

allroundexperts commented Oct 30, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2023-11-02.at.8.51.21.AM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-11-02.at.8.53.15.AM.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2023-11-02.at.8.55.44.AM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-11-02.at.8.57.34.AM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-11-02.at.8.40.21.AM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-11-02.at.8.48.59.AM.mov

@allroundexperts
Copy link

@DylanDylann Getting this crash.

Screen.Recording.2023-10-30.at.9.58.13.AM.mov

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

DylanDylann commented Oct 30, 2023

@allroundexperts how did you install the package? please help check if you have the dist folder in node_modules/react-beautiful-dnd

@allroundexperts
Copy link

@DylanDylann I cloned the package locally and did a npm install <path to the local package> in main repo.

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

please help check if you have the dist folder in node_modules/react-beautiful-dnd

what about this one? @allroundexperts

@allroundexperts
Copy link

@DylanDylann I did and attached is the node_modules/react-beautiful-dnd/dist/react-beautiful-dnd.js file:
https://file.io/bYrbkXCb0P8v

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

On my side, after create run webpack to create dist files, here is the result:
Screenshot from 2023-10-30 12-13-36

How do you create the dist files? @allroundexperts

@allroundexperts
Copy link

yarn build

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

DylanDylann commented Oct 30, 2023

Here are steps to create dist files from my side @allroundexperts :

  1. clone package: git clone https://github.com/DylanDylann/react-beautiful-dnd.git
  2. cd to this clone: cd react-beautiful-dnd/
  3. git checkout fix/28797-apply-patch-to-fork
  4. yarn install
  5. yarn build

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link

@allroundexperts do you still have crashes?

@allroundexperts
Copy link

@hayata-suenaga Yes. But I'll try again tonight.

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

@allroundexperts if you encounter any issue, feel free to ask me

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

@allroundexperts do you have any stuck with this one?

@allroundexperts
Copy link

@DylanDylann The crash is still happening.

@allroundexperts
Copy link

I'm following the exact steps that you mentioned here

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

DylanDylann commented Nov 2, 2023

@allroundexperts please give me your dist folder`s structure after folow these steps? #1 (comment). Here is mine:

image

@allroundexperts
Copy link

Here's my directory structure.

Screenshot 2023-11-02 at 8 21 27 AM

@allroundexperts
Copy link

The same files are symlinked in the main repo as well.

Screenshot 2023-11-02 at 8 22 00 AM

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

DylanDylann commented Nov 2, 2023

@allroundexperts yeah. But just need to move only the dist result to the main repo, like below:
image

@allroundexperts
Copy link

@allroundexperts yeah. Bu just need to move only the dist result to the main repo, like below: image

Doing an npm install <path to local package> more accurately mimics the production scenario. Just copying over the dist is not a good idea IMO.

@allroundexperts
Copy link

Also, after copying over, have you removed the patch?

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

DylanDylann commented Nov 2, 2023

Doing an npm install more accurately mimics the production scenario. Just copying over the dist is not a good idea IMO.

I think currently, we just need to test if the change works properly or not. After PR is merged, we will follow this one #1 (comment)

Also, after copying over, have you removed the patch?

Yes, I removed

@allroundexperts
Copy link

@kosmydel Can you please check if the crash is happening on your side?

@kosmydel
Copy link

kosmydel commented Nov 2, 2023

I've quickly checked, and the crash doesn't affect me.

Did you pack the library, @allroundexperts?

You should:

  1. Use yarn and yarn pack in the library root.
  2. That command will display a path to the .tgz file.
  3. Copy this path, and in the Expensify/App use it: npm install <path>.
  4. Verify if the package.json was updated.
  5. Run the app.

@allroundexperts
Copy link

I was missing yarn pack. It works now. Thanks @kosmydel and @DylanDylann!

Copy link

@allroundexperts allroundexperts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

DylanDylann commented Nov 2, 2023

Thanks @allroundexperts and @kosmydel.
@hayata-suenaga can you review this PR as C+ just approved.

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga merged commit c76911c into Expensify:master Nov 2, 2023
@DylanDylann
Copy link
Author

@hayata-suenaga can you help publish this fork package?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants