Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revisit implementation of operators to add hierarchy operators #147

Open
9 tasks
jordimontana82 opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
9 tasks

Comments

@jordimontana82 jordimontana82 changed the title Revist implementation of operators to add hierachy operators Revisit implementation of operators to add hierachy operators Jul 31, 2024
@jordimontana82
Copy link
Contributor Author

An initial work has started with the following PRs:

DynamicsValue/fake-xrm-easy-abstractions#58
DynamicsValue/fake-xrm-easy-core#85

@jordimontana82 jordimontana82 changed the title Revisit implementation of operators to add hierachy operators Revisit implementation of operators to add hierarchy operators Jul 31, 2024
@sbosman84
Copy link

Cool! If you agree with the approach I've chosen to solve the above operator I can quite easily also implement the other operators mentioned above as well.

@jordimontana82
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sbosman84 I had a quick look and it looks fine thanks Sandor, let me have a look in more detail in a local branch and add some feedback, then we can bring the other ops if that's ok? :)

@sbosman84
Copy link

@jordimontana82 Sounds like a plan!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants