Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Coding standards for z-indexing #140

Open
DFurnes opened this issue Feb 20, 2014 · 7 comments
Open

Coding standards for z-indexing #140

DFurnes opened this issue Feb 20, 2014 · 7 comments

Comments

@DFurnes
Copy link
Contributor

DFurnes commented Feb 20, 2014

Mr. Watson suggested using increments of 100 to separate feature "layers", so we have some room to fiddle with things in between. We should revisit that at some arbitrary date in the future because it seems like a smart idea. 🍎
@mmwtsn
Copy link
Contributor

mmwtsn commented Feb 20, 2014

Mr. Watson Coyier!

@weerd
Copy link
Contributor

weerd commented Apr 1, 2014

Approve!

@DFurnes
Copy link
Contributor Author

DFurnes commented Nov 10, 2014

Some good thinking on this – http://www.sitepoint.com/better-solution-managing-z-index-sass/

@weerd
Copy link
Contributor

weerd commented Nov 10, 2014

Nice find!

@mmwtsn
Copy link
Contributor

mmwtsn commented Nov 11, 2014

That's really clever.

Also:

z-index-test

@weerd
Copy link
Contributor

weerd commented Nov 11, 2014

Lol. Is there a submarine emoji so you can do -100? Fish emoji could also apply? Giant squid === -10000, haha

@DFurnes
Copy link
Contributor Author

DFurnes commented Nov 11, 2014

Oh my god. That is the future.

@DFurnes DFurnes added this to the Neue 6.0 milestone Dec 10, 2014
@DFurnes DFurnes modified the milestones: Neue 6.1, Neue 6.0 Jan 29, 2015
@DFurnes DFurnes removed this from the Neue 6.1 milestone Mar 2, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@weerd @DFurnes @mmwtsn