Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Process crashing without any intents #644

Closed
3 tasks done
Skelmis opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #646
Closed
3 tasks done

Process crashing without any intents #644

Skelmis opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #646
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@Skelmis
Copy link
Contributor

Skelmis commented Jul 19, 2022

Summary

When using Intents.none(), occasionally the bot will crash with the following error

Reproduction Steps

Turned on my bot with intents=Intents.none(), while the bot is running it then proceeds to crash occasionally with the above error.

After some back n forward we believe this error is due to guilds the bot has joined during runtime, as it doesn't have any runtime information on the guild itself to use.

You can read the entire discussion here

Minimal Reproducible Code

No response

Expected Results

My bot not to crash.

Actual Results

My bot crashed.

Intents

Intents.none()

System Information

Python3.10
Disnake master

Checklist

  • I have searched the open issues for duplicates.
  • I have shown the entire traceback, if possible.
  • I have removed my token from display, if visible.

Additional Context

No response

@Skelmis Skelmis added the unconfirmed bug Something might not be working label Jul 19, 2022
@shiftinv shiftinv added bug Something isn't working and removed unconfirmed bug Something might not be working labels Jul 20, 2022
@onerandomusername onerandomusername added this to the disnake v2.6 milestone Aug 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants