You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your job!
But I am confused about the concept of vertical federated learning in your paper. Therefore, the server has access to both of the model parameters and their gradients.
In vertical federated learning, why should the server access the local model parameters?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi thank you for your question.
The VFL protocol we applied in our paper is from paper "Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applications" which is a typical and widely used VFL training protocol
In their proposed protocol, the server is the one responsible for model parameter updating and broadcasting. This is the reason why the server has the access to both the model parameter and the gradients of loss w.r.t them.
You are welcomed to send me questions through the email jinxiao96@gmail.com which I will response you quicker.
Thanks for your job!
But I am confused about the concept of vertical federated learning in your paper.
Therefore, the server has access to both of the model parameters and their gradients.
In vertical federated learning, why should the server access the local model parameters?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: