Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about vertical federated learning #2

Open
jiahuanluo opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Question about vertical federated learning #2

jiahuanluo opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@jiahuanluo
Copy link

Thanks for your job!
But I am confused about the concept of vertical federated learning in your paper.
Therefore, the server has access to both of the model parameters and their gradients.
In vertical federated learning, why should the server access the local model parameters?

@DeRafael
Copy link
Owner

Hi thank you for your question.
The VFL protocol we applied in our paper is from paper "Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applications" which is a typical and widely used VFL training protocol
In their proposed protocol, the server is the one responsible for model parameter updating and broadcasting. This is the reason why the server has the access to both the model parameter and the gradients of loss w.r.t them.

You are welcomed to send me questions through the email jinxiao96@gmail.com which I will response you quicker.

Best,
Xiao Jin

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants