Replies: 2 comments 8 replies
-
Maybe we don't even need a new syntax, and can synthesize PTR records for all entries that have an IP address? The flip side is that is will double the amount of required memory, and some people have huge cloaking lists. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@matoro It should function correctly, but I do still need to build in the switch to make this optional for those with large cloaking files. To build, simply checking out that branch, and building with something like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Right now, according to this line, the cloaking rules ignore requests for record types other than A/AAAA: https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy/blob/master/dnscrypt-proxy/plugin_cloak.go#L104
My network is static-IP'd, so I use cloaking rules for hardcoding names on my LAN. However, I don't have any way to add in reverse records.
Could there be a simple syntax added to the cloaking plugin to support PTR records? Thank you for all your hard work!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions