You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 7, 2021. It is now read-only.
logically, you are correct, however lift parameter calculation for stock that was published for 1.0 (new aero) was based only on lifting area. The current setup is intended to remain as close to stock as possible, hence the hesitation.
I wouldn't expect a significant difference in mass with thickness (wing considered to be a mostly hollow shell structure), so possibly just modifying the drag would retain the stock alignment. I will need to check how drag is calculated and how stock surfaces vary (if at all)
Thickness not change the wing mass. I think it should.
Also it seems that the thickness doesn't affect the coefficient of drag value, which I think it should. too
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: