Qbv function and Gate control list #36
Replies: 5 comments
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello, 1 - 3: our current gcl implementations works as follows:
4: All traffic sink apps should have a latency statistic. (In result view filter for your device and Latency) Hope this helps. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello, 1.
If I want to set "1ms" as the period, then: 2.
then the GCL "C,C,C,C,C,C,C,C:T1; C,C,C,C,C,C,C,o:T2; ,", According to your description, this GCL means:
Is my understanding right? Thank you very much!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi,
Best regards |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you very much. Until now all my questions have been addressed and thus I will close this issue. Thank you again. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello, CoRE group,
Recently, I researched the example "IEEE8021Qbv" of CoRE4INET, and came up with 4 questions, hoping to hear your thoughts.
In your framework, what the policy of assigning traffic to a specific queue? based on the priority of that traffic? To be more specific, assume in node1, it can generate Q-tag traffic with priority 5, this traffic will be automatically inserted to Queue 5 or we can set up the parameter to make this traffic to a specific queue, e.g., queue 7.
What does the "parameter[0]" (see below) parameter mean?
What is the hyper-period of GCL? Does it equal to the sum of parameter “period” in GCL? E.g., a GCL is that ""C,C,C,C,C,C,C,C:0;C,C,C,C,C,C,C,o:0.00015;o,C,C,C,C,C,C,C:0.0003"", does it mean this GCL will be performed repeatly every 0.00045 sec? From the simulation result, it seems not...
How to measure the end-to-end delay from node1 (talker) to node2 (listener)?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions