Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Refactor Electrochemical Reactions #139

Closed
ischoegl opened this issue Feb 24, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by Cantera/cantera#1216
Closed

Refactor Electrochemical Reactions #139

ischoegl opened this issue Feb 24, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by Cantera/cantera#1216
Assignees
@ischoegl
Labels
feature-request New feature request

Comments

@ischoegl
Copy link
Member

ischoegl commented Feb 24, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Abstract

While Cantera/cantera#1181 creates the core infrastructure for the revised InterfaceKinetics (via #87), electrochemical reaction (rates) were carved out as they require additional thought (e.g. see #38 and #44; tagging @decaluwe).

This feature request is created as a reminder that a stop-gap solution needs to be in place for 2.6 as both legacy CTI/XML input as well as the associated legacy framework are slated for immediate removal after the 2.6 release.
@ischoegl ischoegl added the feature-request New feature request label Feb 24, 2022
This was referenced Mar 13, 2022
Closed
Merged
@ischoegl ischoegl self-assigned this Mar 14, 2022
@ischoegl ischoegl changed the title Refactor Electro-Chemical Reactions Refactor Electrochemical Reactions Mar 15, 2022
@ischoegl ischoegl mentioned this issue May 1, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ischoegl ischoegl

Labels
feature-request New feature request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Refactor electrochemical reactions ischoegl/cantera
1 participant
@ischoegl