We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For datasets, the isAbout field seems to be the best place to store (complex) context level annotations:
isAbout
Different entities (biological entity, taxonomic information, disease, molecular entity, anatomical part, treatment) associated with this dataset
At the moment isAbout is not a required field in the DATS dataset schema. We have discussed to make it a required field within CONP.
This could happen either by
"required"
We should discuss which of these to go with.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
For datasets, the
isAbout
field seems to be the best place to store (complex) context level annotations:At the moment
isAbout
is not a required field in the DATS dataset schema. We have discussed to make it a required field within CONP.This could happen either by
isAbout
to the"required"
keyword of the schemaisAbout
requirement to our custom DATS validatorWe should discuss which of these to go with.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: