C++ vs Python

[gswifort]

Based on this issue, I think that as many things as possible should be implemented in Python (instead of C++).

1. You are only one person :)
2. This project is dedicated to Python programmers, so most likely a Python implementation would be more readable for them and they might want to contribute to it,
3. We have no documentation, Python code will be more readable for programmers who want to better understand what a function does.

[CEXT-Dan]

I agree, the whole idea is for Python users to extend ARX from this project. I miss read the discussion in [#166], sorry for that.

for this particular case, there was no readymade solution from boost::python, it was a challenge, like a splinter in my mind that I had to solve. By having a deeper understanding of boost::python, the cooler things I can deliver to the C++ and Python community.

Oops

[CEXT-Dan]

I suppose there needs to be infrastructure for pure python tooling, I will play around with different folder structures to find something minimally disruptive to C++ development. For now, just put everything in pyrx

We have all = ("Ap", "Br", "Db", "Ed", "Ge", "Gi", "Gs", "Pl", "Rx", "Sm", "Ax")
Any thoughts on what a pure python module(namespace )might look like?

[gswifort]

I think there should be packages with the same names as c++. i.e. db with tools to support Db, ed with tools to support Ed etc.