-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
/
Copy pathrun.json
62 lines (57 loc) · 2 KB
/
run.json
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
<output>
<articles>
<article id="46">
<confidence>
<cscore>4</cscore>
<creason>Article discusses a solar panel manufacturing project and related tax incentives in Fort Mill, South Carolina</creason>
</confidence>
<favorability>
<fscore>2</fscore>
<freason>Article suggests some uncertainty around whether the tax incentives will be approved</freason>
</favorability>
<county>York County</county>
<state>South Carolina</state>
</article>
<article id="47">
<confidence>
<cscore>5</cscore>
<creason>Article clearly discusses a solar energy project in Morgan County</creason>
</confidence>
<favorability>
<fscore>3</fscore>
<freason>Article suggests some public concerns but does not take a strong stance</freason>
</favorability>
<county>Morgan County</county>
<state>Colorado</state>
</article>
<article id="48">
<confidence>
<cscore>5</cscore>
<creason>Article discusses regulations for large-scale solar projects in Linn County, Iowa</creason>
</confidence>
<favorability>
<fscore>2</fscore>
<freason>Article suggests the county is moving toward stricter regulations</freason>
</favorability>
<county>Linn County</county>
<state>Iowa</state>
</article>
<article id="49">
<confidence>
<cscore>5</cscore>
<creason>Article clearly discusses approval of a solar project expansion in Clinton County</creason>
</confidence>
<favorability>
<fscore>4</fscore>
<freason>Article suggests consensus in approving the expansion</freason>
</favorability>
<county>Clinton County</county>
<state>Iowa</state>
</article>
<article id="50">
<confidence>
<cscore>1</cscore>
<creason>Article discusses solar panels on a farm building in the UK, not a utility-scale project in the US</creason>
</article>
</articles>
</output>