-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
/
Copy pathhartmangn.tex
95 lines (69 loc) · 4.23 KB
/
hartmangn.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
\subsubsection{Hirzebruch's smooth compactification}\label{H-compact}
\vskip 0.3in
We let $X'$ be the Baily-Borel compactifciation of $X$, which is
obtained by collapsing in $\overline{X}$ each boundary component
$e'(P)$ to a single point or topologically by taking a cone on each
component of the Borel-Serre boundary. It is well known that $X'$
is a projective algebraic variety. We let $\tilde{X}$ be Hirzebruch's
smooth resolution of the cusp singularities and $\pi:\tilde{X} \to
X'$ be the natural map collapsing the compactifying divisors for
each cusp. We let $j:X \hookrightarrow \tilde{X}$ be the natural
embedding. Note that the Borel-Serre boundary separates $\tilde{X}$
into two pieces, the (connected) inside $X^{in}$, which is isomorphic
to $X$ and the (disconnected) outside $X^{out}$, which for each
cusp is a neighborhood of the compactifying divisors. Note that we
can view $e'(P)$ as lying in both $X^{in}$ and $X^{out}$ since the
intersection $X^{in} \cap X^{out}$ is equal to $ \coprod_{\underline{P}}
e({P})$.
\vskip 0.3in
\section{(Co)homology}
\vskip 0.3in
In this section we describe the relationship between the (co)homology of the various
compactifications.
\vskip 0.3in
\subsection{The homology of the boundary components}\label{boundaryhom}
\vskip 0.3in
Every element of $\Gamma_N =\pi_1(T^2)$ is a rational multiple of
a commutator in $\Gamma_P$ and accordingly the image of $H_1(T^2,\Q)$
in $H_1(e'(P),\Q)$ is trivial.
Let $a_P \in H_1(e'(P),\Z)$ be the class of the identity section
of $\kappa:e'(P) \to X_W$ and $b_P \in H_2(e'(P),\Z)$ be the class
of the torus fiber of $\kappa$. It is clear that the intersection
number of $a_P$ and $b_P$ is $1$ (up to sign) whence $a_P$ and $b_P$
are nontrivial primitive classes. Furthermore, $a_P$ generates
$H_1(e'(P),\Q)$ and $ H_2(e'(P),\Z) \cong \Z$, generated by $b_P$.
So
\vskip 0.3in
\begin{lemma}\label{ePhomology}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(i)] The first rational homology group of $e'(P)$ is generated by $a_P$.
\item[(ii)] The second homology group of $e'(P)$ is generated by $b_P$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}
\begin{remark} To compute the homology over $\Z$ one has only to use the Wang sequence for a fiber bundle over a circle, see \cite{Milnor}, page 67.
\end{remark}
Let $\Omega_P$ be the unique $P$-invariant $2$-form on $e'(P)$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{areaform}
\int_{b_P} \Omega_P = 1.
\end{equation}
Since $b_P$ is the image of the fundamental class of $T^2$ inside $H_2(e'(P),\Z)$, we see that that the restriction of $\Omega_P$ to $T^2$ lifts to the area form on $W_{\R} \simeq N$ normalized such that $T^2=\G_N \back N$ has area $1$.
\vskip 0.3in
\subsection{Homology and cohomology of $X$ and $\tilde{X}$}
Accordingly to the discussion in Section~\ref{H-compact} we have the Mayer-Vietoris sequence
\[
0 \to \oplus_P H_2(e'(P)) \to H_2(X) \oplus (\oplus_P S_P) \to H_2(\tilde{X}) \to 0.
\]
Here $S_{P}$ denotes the span of the classes defined by compactifying divisors at the cusp associated to $P$. The zero on the left comes from $H_3(\tilde{X}) =0$ and the zero on the right comes from the fact that for each $P$ the class $a_P$ injects into $H_1(X^{out})$, see \cite{vGeer}, II.3. Since the generator $b_P$ has trivial intersection with each of the compactifying divisors, $b_P$ bounds on the outside so a fortiori it bounds in $\tilde{X}$. Thus the above short exact sequence is the sum
of the two short exact sequences $\oplus_P H_2(e'(P)) \to H_2(X) \to j_{\ast} H_2(X)$ and
$ 0 \to \oplus_P S_P \to \oplus_P S_P $. By adding the third terms of the two sequences and equating them to $H_2(\tilde{X})$ we obtain the orthogonal splittings (for the intersection pairing) - see also \cite{vGeer}, p.123,
\begin{align*}\label{vdG2}
H_2(\tilde{X}) = j_{\ast} H_2(X) \oplus \left( \oplus_{[P]} S_{P} \right), \qquad \qquad
H^2(\tilde{X}) = j_{\#} H_c^2(X) \oplus \left(\oplus_{[P]} S^{\vee}_{P}\right).
\end{align*}
Here $j_{\#}$ is the push-forward map. Furthermore, the pairings on each summand are non-degenerate. Considering $\oplus_P H_2(e'(P)) \to H_2(X) \to j_{\ast} H_2(X)$ we also obtain
\begin{proposition}\label{intersectionhom}
$H_2(\partial \overline{X})$ is the kernel of $j_{\ast}$ so that
\[
j_{\ast} H_2(X) \simeq H_2(X)/ \sum_{[P]} H_2(e'(P)).
\]
\end{proposition}