You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.
It would be useful to add a field to the annotation format that would allow the curator to attribute a level of quality to an annotation. This would make it easier for the user of these annotations to filter out some annotations that might be less reliable. Such cases can happen for example when:
1 - A corrigendum has been published for the paper, which states that some of the information of the original document invalid.
2 - The curator has identified limitations or error in the method of the paper.
3 - Since the publication of the paper, novel and more accurate methods have been made available to measure the same phenomenon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be useful to add a field to the annotation format that would allow the curator to attribute a level of quality to an annotation. This would make it easier for the user of these annotations to filter out some annotations that might be less reliable. Such cases can happen for example when:
1 - A corrigendum has been published for the paper, which states that some of the information of the original document invalid.
2 - The curator has identified limitations or error in the method of the paper.
3 - Since the publication of the paper, novel and more accurate methods have been made available to measure the same phenomenon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: