Completion after the resource type should show = in addition to existing

[pakrym]

Considering most resource definitions do not use existing customers can be confused about why is that the only completion offered.

Adding = allows efficiently chaining completions:

[pakrym]

cc @majastrz

[pakrym]

In case you think this feature is appropriate: #4599

[majastrz]

We've had a few discussions that went back and forth on the topic of including completions for operator-like things. I was against this originally, but it looks really good in practice. It also has the benefit of guiding inexperienced users towards the correct syntax ("pit of success"). Without this, they'd have to look up an example to figure it out or check the error message.

@alex-frankel, @anthony-c-martin, @shenglol thoughts?

[shenglol]

I'm fine with it. I was also against this because typing = is sort of a muscle memory, but I think @pakrym has a good point, and I agree with @majastrz that it looks good in practice - that GIF convinced me.

[alex-frankel]

I'm good with it also

[anthony-c-martin]

I'm all for it. IMO - the more useful completions/code fixes we can provide the better, as they serve as a way of learning the language. For example, existing was pretty undiscoverable before we added that completion.