Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
218 lines (185 loc) · 8.31 KB

lbaw1763_a9.md

File metadata and controls

218 lines (185 loc) · 8.31 KB

A9: Main accesses to the database and transactions

This artefact shows the main accesses to the database, as well as the transactions necessary for ensuring database consistency.

For each transaction, the isolation level is explicitly stated and read-only transactions are identified to improve global performance. For each identified access, the SQL code and the reference of web resources (A7) are provided.

1. Main Accesses

This section describes the main accesses to the database.

SQL101 Search all questions by their title
Web Resource R301 
SELECT *
FROM questions
WHERE
  tstitle @@ plainto_tsquery('english', $search_query)
ORDER BY
  ts_rank(tstitle, plainto_tsquery('english', $search_query))
  DESC;

The tstitle column is of type "tsvector", and is equal to to_tsvector('english', title), as advised in class. This column is kept consistent with the title by updating it with triggers "on insert" and "on update".

SQL102 Get recent questions
Web Resource R301 
SELECT questions.id, title, correct_answer,
  score, is_banned, author, content, creation_time
FROM questions, commentables, messages, message_versions
WHERE
  questions.id = commentables.id AND
  commentables.id = messages.id AND
  messages.id = message_versions.message_id AND
  messages.latest_version = message_versions.id
ORDER BY
  message_versions.creation_time DESC
LIMIT 25;
SQL103 Get a question's details
Web Resource R306 
SELECT *
FROM questions, messages, message_versions
WHERE
  questions.id = $question_id AND
  questions.id = messages.id AND
  messages.latest_version = message_versions.id;
SQL104 Post a questions
Web Resource R307 
INSERT INTO messages (author) VALUES ($author) RETURNING id INTO new_id;
INSERT INTO commentables (id) VALUES (new_id);
INSERT INTO questions (id, title) VALUES (new_id, $title);
INSERT INTO message_versions (content, message_id) values ($content, new_id);
SQL105 Post an answer
Web Resource R314 
INSERT INTO messages (author) VALUES ($author) RETURNING id INTO new_id;
INSERT INTO commentables (id) VALUES (new_id);
INSERT INTO answers (id, question_id) VALUES (new_id, $question);
INSERT INTO message_versions (content, message_id) values ($content, new_id);
SQL106 Post a comment on a question or answer
Web Resource R318 and R322 
INSERT INTO messages (author) VALUES ($author) RETURNING id INTO new_id;
INSERT INTO comments (id, commentable_id) VALUES (new_id, $commentable);
INSERT INTO message_versions (content, message_id) values ($content, new_id);
SQL107 Get a question's answers and their details
Web Resource R312 and R313 
SELECT *
FROM messages, answers, message_versions
WHERE
  answers.question_id = $question_id AND
  messages.id = answers.id AND
  messages.latest_version = message_versions.id
ORDER BY
  message_versions.creation_time
  DESC;
SQL108 Get a commentable's comments (question or answer).
Web Resource R317 and R321 
SELECT *
FROM commentables, messages, message_versions, comments
WHERE
  commentables.id = $commentable_id AND
  commentables.id = messages.id AND
  comments.commentable_id = commentables.id AND
  message_versions.id = messages.latest_version
ORDER BY
  message_versions.creation_time
  DESC;

2. Transactions

Transactions needed to assure the integrity of the data.

T01 Insert a question
Justification Since a object-oriented approach was used to map the question UML subclass to the relational model, atomicity must be guaranteed so all classes that need to be inserted are in fact all or none inserted.
Isolation level Read Uncommitted 
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;

DO $$
DECLARE
  new_id INTEGER;
BEGIN
  INSERT INTO messages (author) VALUES ($author) RETURNING id INTO new_id;
  INSERT INTO commentables (id) VALUES (new_id);
  INSERT INTO questions (id, title) VALUES (new_id, $title);
  INSERT INTO message_versions (content, message_id) values ($content, new_id);
END $$;

COMMIT;
T02 Insert an answer
Justification Since a object-oriented approach was used to map the answer UML subclass to the relational model, atomicity must be guaranteed so all classes that need to be inserted are in fact all or none inserted.
Isolation level Read Uncommitted 
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;

DO $$
DECLARE
  new_id INTEGER;
BEGIN
  INSERT INTO messages (author) VALUES ($author) RETURNING id INTO new_id;
  INSERT INTO commentables (id) VALUES (new_id);
  INSERT INTO answers (id, question_id) VALUES (new_id, $question);
  INSERT INTO message_versions (content, message_id) values ($content, new_id);
END $$;

COMMIT;
T03 Insert a comment
Justification Since a object-oriented approach was used to map the comment UML subclass to the relational model, atomicity must be guaranteed so all classes that need to be inserted are in fact all or none inserted.
Isolation level Read Uncommitted 
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED;

DO $$
DECLARE
  new_id INTEGER;
BEGIN
  INSERT INTO messages (author) VALUES ($author) RETURNING id INTO new_id;
  INSERT INTO comments (id, commentable_id) VALUES (new_id, $commentable);
  INSERT INTO message_versions (content, message_id) values ($content, new_id);
END $$;

COMMIT;

Several other user stories would require the use of transactions. Fortunately, by default all statements like insert, update or delete are inside their own transaction and the triggers that are fired by them also run in the same transaction. Therefore if anything fails in the execution of the trigger, then everything is rolled back, including the initial statement that fired the trigger.

We've made extensive use of this autocommit mode to ensure database integrity. For example, when a vote is made to a message, a trigger updates its score value. If these two actions weren't executed inside the same transaction and there was a failure in updating the score attribute, then the number of positive votes minus the negative ones wouldn't match the score, leaving the database in a inconsistent state. This is true for all derived attributes, whose consistency is ensured by triggers.

In this example the trigger TRIGGER06 can be replaced by the following transaction:

BEGIN TRANSACTION;
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;

INSER INTO votes (message_id, user_id, positive)
  values ($message_id, $user_id, $positive);
IF $positive THEN
  UPDATE messages
    SET score = score + 1
    WHERE $message_id = messages.id;
ELSIF NOT $positive THEN
  UPDATE messages
    SET score = score - 1
    WHERE $message_id = messages.id;
END IF;

COMMIT;

Revision history

  • 01/05/2018: Added links to resources.
  • 02/05/2018: Added example transaction that would be needed if triggers weren't run in the same transaction as the statement which fired it.

GROUP1763, 24/04/2018

André Cruz, up201503776@fe.up.pt
Daniel Marques, up201503822@fe.up.pt
Edgar Carneiro, up201503784@fe.up.pt
João Carvalho, up201504875@fe.up.pt