You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After doing the 6 puzzles on the ARCPRIZE homepage, I had the "How hard can it even be?" and thought of ways certain variables should be passed along the neural network and others could be learned to recognise. For example that 4 blocks of a certain color in a certain position could be a square or a line, isn't a hard job. My plan was to do a few of the hard puzzles and take note of the variables and or meanings of certain things, I started with writing down: difference between Input and output for each test and the differences between the tests themselves as the things that they have in common.
As history repeats it's self when participating in these challenges: I got carried away by the puzzles themselves. Friday at 19:40, I started recording my adventure. My submission this week has not a single line of code nor did I write a single line of code. And there is noting to try (other than trying to solve the puzzles yourself). So what is my submission?
Well, I managed to solve all of the 400 hard puzzles over the weekend, manually. And plan to upload the full (redacted tho) recording when edit&render are finished coming days. Knowing WHAT the solution is for a puzzle, won't get you very far. The HOW is far more important. Seeing someone solve the puzzle and how they tried different wrong ideas will make it easier to teach an AI to solve it, in the end.
I did also learn a few valuable lessons doing this:
1. I should Look at the different tools and get up to speed on what is possible within a certain app.
Only after puzzle 64 I discovered that copy pasting of blocks worked & there was a fill tool. This is why my completion time drastically improved and made les mistakes.
2. As Sherlock Holmes once said: "When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
After double checking if I missed a block, color or rule, completely restart the puzzle several times, getting mad (will be censured in the full version tho). Instead of wasting almost 45min on a single puzzle, I should've anticipated likely mistakes someone could've made and ambiguities examples when creating this puzzle. In the end I found 3 mistakes: (50f325b5, 0d87d2a6)
3. When streaming, avoid music.
I am used to constantly have music on, from a sing along track from the Beatles to darker techno tracks from VTSS, but also Bugge Wesseltoft presenting his New Concept of Jazz or Frank Ocean. Unfortunately you can not use music without the proper licenses when streaming. Apart from the complete ridiculous look of me singing along a track without the track actually playing, I will have to mute most of the audio which also contained explanations for some of the harder puzzles
Some stats:
Average completion time: 01m18s
Median completion time: 38s
Average tries: 1,6
Median tries: 1
Listened to 19h29m of music
Drank 4 bricks of milk, 5L water and 9 cups of coffee
Fell asleep 2 times for +-15s behind my desk and yes this is recorded and pretty funny
So I will upload the video with a +18h length in the next few days where I manually find all the paterns, and was able to hit a 100% on a benchmark although the tests contained some mistakes 🙆♂️
Cheers
Nicogs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After doing the 6 puzzles on the ARCPRIZE homepage, I had the "How hard can it even be?" and thought of ways certain variables should be passed along the neural network and others could be learned to recognise. For example that 4 blocks of a certain color in a certain position could be a square or a line, isn't a hard job. My plan was to do a few of the hard puzzles and take note of the variables and or meanings of certain things, I started with writing down: difference between Input and output for each test and the differences between the tests themselves as the things that they have in common.
As history repeats it's self when participating in these challenges: I got carried away by the puzzles themselves. Friday at 19:40, I started recording my adventure. My submission this week has not a single line of code nor did I write a single line of code. And there is noting to try (other than trying to solve the puzzles yourself). So what is my submission?
Well, I managed to solve all of the 400 hard puzzles over the weekend, manually. And plan to upload the full (redacted tho) recording when edit&render are finished coming days. Knowing WHAT the solution is for a puzzle, won't get you very far. The HOW is far more important. Seeing someone solve the puzzle and how they tried different wrong ideas will make it easier to teach an AI to solve it, in the end.
Here is a small 15 second timelapse of the whole weekend
I did also learn a few valuable lessons doing this:
1. I should Look at the different tools and get up to speed on what is possible within a certain app.
Only after puzzle 64 I discovered that copy pasting of blocks worked & there was a fill tool. This is why my completion time drastically improved and made les mistakes.
2. As Sherlock Holmes once said: "When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
After double checking if I missed a block, color or rule, completely restart the puzzle several times, getting mad (will be censured in the full version tho). Instead of wasting almost 45min on a single puzzle, I should've anticipated likely mistakes someone could've made and ambiguities examples when creating this puzzle. In the end I found 3 mistakes: (50f325b5, 0d87d2a6)
3. When streaming, avoid music.
I am used to constantly have music on, from a sing along track from the Beatles to darker techno tracks from VTSS, but also Bugge Wesseltoft presenting his New Concept of Jazz or Frank Ocean. Unfortunately you can not use music without the proper licenses when streaming. Apart from the complete ridiculous look of me singing along a track without the track actually playing, I will have to mute most of the audio which also contained explanations for some of the harder puzzles
Some stats:
So I will upload the video with a +18h length in the next few days where I manually find all the paterns, and was able to hit a 100% on a benchmark although the tests contained some mistakes 🙆♂️
Cheers
Nicogs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: