-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Chem.method
16329 lines (16329 loc) · 843 KB
/
Chem.method
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
Showing criteria for selection were approved by the 194
Showing criteria for selection was approved by the 161
Showing criteria for selection were as follows 117
Showing criteria for selection was defined as the 108
Showing criteria for selection was defined as the lowest 74
Showing criteria for selection were selected for 67
Showing criteria for selection was selected as the 63
Showing criteria for selection was defined as the amount of 52
Showing criteria for selection was chosen as the 42
Showing criteria for selection were selected for the 39
Showing criteria for selection and approved by the 39
Showing criteria for selection were selected for further 35
Showing criteria for selection were selected as the 35
Showing criteria for selection were selected as 34
Showing criteria for selection were performed in accordance with the 33
Showing criteria for selection was defined as 32
Showing criteria for selection were conducted in accordance with the 31
Showing criteria for selection was selected for 30
Showing criteria for selection is defined as the 30
Showing criteria for selection were selected from the 26
Showing criteria for selection were selected and 25
Showing criteria for selection were in accordance with the 24
Showing criteria for selection were chosen for 23
Showing criteria for selection was selected for the 22
Showing criteria for selection were chosen as the 21
Showing criteria for selection was conducted in accordance with the 20
Showing criteria for selection were defined as the lowest 20
Showing criteria for selection was selected as a 20
Showing criteria for selection were defined as the 19
Showing criteria for selection were selected based on the 19
Showing criteria for selection used were as follows 18
Showing criteria for selection were selected based on 18
Showing criteria for selection were seeded at a 17
Showing criteria for selection was selected as 15
Showing criteria for selection approved by the 15
Showing criteria for selection were performed in accordance with 15
Showing criteria for selection is defined as the amount of 15
Showing criteria for selection were plated at a 14
Showing criteria for selection was chosen as a 14
Showing criteria for selection was defined as a 13
Showing criteria for selection were chosen for further 13
Showing criteria for selection were randomly selected for 13
Showing criteria for selection were chosen as 13
Showing criteria for selection was chosen for the 13
Showing criteria for selection was chosen based on the 12
Showing criteria for selection were chosen for the 12
Showing criteria for selection and use of 12
Showing criteria for selection were approved by 12
Showing criteria for selection were randomly selected and 12
Showing criteria for selection used for this 11
Showing criteria for selection and were used as received 11
Showing criteria for selection at 4 c with the following 11
Showing criteria for selection with a 12 h 11
Showing criteria for selection was defined as the final 10
Showing criteria for selection were selected by 10
Showing criteria for selection was selected for further 10
Showing criteria for selection were optimized as follows 10
Showing criteria for selection were the following 9
Showing criteria for selection was selected based on the 9
Showing criteria for selection was chosen for 9
Showing criteria for selection were selected on the basis of 9
Showing criteria for selection were selected for this 9
Showing criteria for selection was selected according to the 9
Showing criteria for selection were strictly in accordance with the 9
Showing criteria for selection were designed for 8
Showing criteria for selection selected for the 8
Showing criteria for selection were chosen based on 8
Showing criteria for selection were approved by the * in accordance with the 8
Showing criteria for selection was defined by the 8
Showing criteria for selection was defined as an 8
Showing criteria for selection were randomly selected from 8
Showing criteria for selection used was a 8
Showing criteria for selection under the following 8
Showing criteria for selection was based on previous 8
Showing criteria for selection was chosen as 8
Showing criteria for selection used in this work were 7
Showing criteria for selection was the lowest 7
Showing criteria for selection gave their informed * before they participated in the 7
Showing criteria for selection was selected based on 7
Showing criteria for selection and were approved by the 7
Showing criteria for selection conditions were as follows 7
Showing criteria for selection were selected in the 7
Showing criteria for selection was defined by 7
Showing criteria for selection were selected based on their 7
Showing criteria for selection 25 2 c and 7
Showing criteria for selection and were used as 7
Showing criteria for selection were designed using the 7
Showing criteria for selection were selected according to 7
Showing criteria for selection was selected as an 7
Showing criteria for selection was approved by the * in accordance with the 7
Showing criteria for selection were selected from 7
Showing criteria for selection used in these 6
Showing criteria for selection was approved by 6
Showing criteria for selection were designed by 6
Showing criteria for selection was chosen for further 6
Showing criteria for selection were selected according to the 6
Showing criteria for selection were designed according to the 6
Showing criteria for selection was selected and 6
Showing criteria for selection used in this * were as follows 6
Showing criteria for selection were routinely maintained in 6
Showing criteria for selection of the following 6
Showing criteria for selection were determined on the basis of the 6
Showing criteria for selection was selected from the 6
Showing criteria for selection 22 2 c and 6
Showing criteria for selection is defined as a 6
Showing criteria for selection were as follows the 6
Showing criteria for selection selected according to the 6
Showing criteria for selection were designed and 6
Showing criteria for selection 250300 g were 6
Showing criteria for selection were designed based on 6
Showing criteria for selection were selected for each 6
Showing criteria for selection used were a 01 6
Showing criteria for selection was routinely cultured in 6
Showing criteria for selection was selected on the basis of 6
Showing criteria for selection were approved by the * and were conducted in accordance with the 6
Showing criteria for selection were designed according to 6
Showing criteria for selection were maintained in * at 37 c in a 5
Showing criteria for selection was selected and the 5
Showing criteria for selection were determined as the lowest 5
Showing criteria for selection were routinely grown in 5
Showing criteria for selection were selected and the 5
Showing criteria for selection used was as follows 5
Showing criteria for selection is determined by 5
Showing criteria for selection we selected the 5
Showing criteria for selection g were provided by the 5
Showing criteria for selection committee of the 5
Showing criteria for selection were selected on the basis of the 5
Showing criteria for selection used the following 5
Showing criteria for selection were the same as those used for the 5
Showing criteria for selection were randomly selected from the 5
Showing criteria for selection were conducted in accordance with 5
Showing criteria for selection is designed for 5
Showing criteria for selection used were the following 5
Showing criteria for selection was designed as a 5
Showing criteria for selection was designed based on the 5
Showing criteria for selection were chosen to be 5
Showing criteria for selection was selected on the basis of the 5
Showing criteria for selection 22 2 c 5
Showing criteria for selection 23 2 c 5
Showing criteria for selection we chose the 5
Showing criteria for selection were as follows 1 5
Showing criteria for selection was chosen based on 5
Showing criteria for selection the choice of the 4
Showing criteria for selection were used 1000 500 250 125 625 32 16 8 4 2 4
Showing criteria for selection for 1 h at 37 c with 4
Showing criteria for selection order according to the 4
Showing criteria for selection used were a 4
Showing criteria for selection was selected for subsequent 4
Showing criteria for selection and were grown in 4
Showing criteria for selection and a 12 h 4
Showing criteria for selection value was defined as the 4
Showing criteria for selection is defined by the 4
Showing criteria for selection were randomly selected in 4
Showing criteria for selection were randomly selected to 4
Showing criteria for selection were randomly chosen 4
Showing criteria for selection were cared for in accordance with the 4
Showing criteria for selection in brief a 4
Showing criteria for selection access to standard 4
Showing criteria for selection were handled in accordance with the 4
Showing criteria for selection was selected by 4
Showing criteria for selection been approved by the 4
Showing criteria for selection was defined as follows 4
Showing criteria for selection were as follows a 4
Showing criteria for selection was 000 5 500 5 1000 30 1500 30 2000 70 2500 70 3500 5 and 12 min for 4
Showing criteria for selection conducted in accordance to the 4
Showing criteria for selection defined by the 4
Showing criteria for selection were selected in 4
Showing criteria for selection had the following 4
Showing criteria for selection and were of the highest 4
Showing criteria for selection were selected with 4
Showing criteria for selection were designed for the 4
Showing criteria for selection 12 h light12 h 4
Showing criteria for selection was determined to be the lowest 4
Showing criteria for selection based on the number of 4
Showing criteria for selection was optimized as follows 4
Showing criteria for selection was selected according to 4
Showing criteria for selection was as follows 010 min 4
Showing criteria for selection were chosen from the 4
Showing criteria for selection were selected in order to 4
Showing criteria for selection was chosen to be 4
Showing criteria for selection conformed to the 4
Showing criteria for selection was defined as the amount that 4
Showing criteria for selection used consisted of a 4
Showing criteria for selection were as follows number of 4
Showing criteria for selection was designed with a 4
Showing criteria for selection and approved on 1 march 2011 4
Showing criteria for selection was selected from 4
Showing criteria for selection were designed as follows 4
Showing criteria for selection can be selected as 4
Showing criteria for selection is defined as the lowest 4
Showing criteria for selection was selected because it 4
Showing criteria for selection on a 12 h 4
Showing criteria for selection reference standard mixture 37 standard 47885-u was 4
Showing criteria for selection were chosen according to the 4
Showing criteria for selection 74 buffer to which 5 l 4
Showing criteria for selection defined as 1 mol of 3
Showing criteria for selection was defined as x y z 3
Showing criteria for selection were optimized in the 3
Showing criteria for selection were approved in accordance with the 3
Showing criteria for selection with the highest 3
Showing criteria for selection was selected after 3
Showing criteria for selection derived from a 3
Showing criteria for selection is expected to be 3
Showing criteria for selection was established from 3
Showing criteria for selection was defined as the difference between the 3
Showing criteria for selection was designed as 3
Showing criteria for selection at the highest 3
Showing criteria for selection were used as follows 3
Showing criteria for selection on a 1212 h 3
Showing criteria for selection and described in the 3
Showing criteria for selection were performed strictly in accordance with 3
Showing criteria for selection with a 1212 h 3
Showing criteria for selection and were dissolved in 3
Showing criteria for selection interactive of the 3
Showing criteria for selection was as follows 02 min 10 3
Showing criteria for selection was used with the following 3
Showing criteria for selection from the six 3
Showing criteria for selection was defined in 3
Showing criteria for selection was considered for the 3
Showing criteria for selection informed consent for 3
Showing criteria for selection was considered a 3
Showing criteria for selection was as follows 02 min 3
Showing criteria for selection selected in the 3
Showing criteria for selection was selected based on our 3
Showing criteria for selection defined on the basis of the 3
Showing criteria for selection were the same as those used for 3
Showing criteria for selection were approved by the * for care and use of 3
Showing criteria for selection c with a 12 h 3
Showing criteria for selection is defined as the amount of the 3
Showing criteria for selection established by the 3
Showing criteria for selection were chosen for this 3
Showing criteria for selection were designed based on the 3
Showing criteria for selection weighing 1822 g were 3
Showing criteria for selection we used two 3
Showing criteria for selection prior to the start of the 3
Showing criteria for selection the one with the highest 3
Showing criteria for selection was selected in 3
Showing criteria for selection was selected in accordance with 3
Showing criteria for selection was selected using a 3
Showing criteria for selection at 25 2 c and 3
Showing criteria for selection with a range of 3
Showing criteria for selection were drawn from the 3
Showing criteria for selection of 20 20 20 was centered in the 3
Showing criteria for selection was designed and 3
Showing criteria for selection was selected with 3
Showing criteria for selection one of the following 3
Showing criteria for selection assay kit was 3
Showing criteria for selection by a single 3
Showing criteria for selection was available and then adjusted by its 3
Showing criteria for selection were plated at 2 104 cellsml into 3
Showing criteria for selection were maintained in * and supplemented with 10 3
Showing criteria for selection in accordance with the following 3
Showing criteria for selection were selected for their 3
Showing criteria for selection used in accordance with the 3
Showing criteria for selection was eluted at a * injection volume was set at 1 l for the 3
Showing criteria for selection were the same as those used in 3
Showing criteria for selection a panel of 3
Showing criteria for selection were approved by the * were carried out in accordance with the 3
Showing criteria for selection the maximum number of 3
Showing criteria for selection flat-bottomed polystyrene plate were filled with 100 l of the appropriate 3
Showing criteria for selection were selected using 3
Showing criteria for selection selected from the 3
Showing criteria for selection supplemented with 1 vv 3
Showing criteria for selection were randomly selected from each 3
Showing criteria for selection were selected as the initial 3
Showing criteria for selection chosen on the basis of 3
Showing criteria for selection were randomly selected 3
Showing criteria for selection was defined based on 3
Showing criteria for selection was chosen for each 3
Showing criteria for selection were routinely maintained as * at 37 c in a 3
Showing criteria for selection were approved by the * and conducted in accordance with the 3
Showing criteria for selection 20 of the 3
Showing criteria for selection were approved by the * institutional animal care and use committee 3
Showing criteria for selection was approved by the * and was conducted according to the 3
Showing criteria for selection 6 105 cellsml were equilibrated at 37 c for 2 min and 3
Showing criteria for selection was as follows 0 3
Showing criteria for selection was chosen in order to 3
Showing criteria for selection are defined as the lowest * at which there was no 3
Showing criteria for selection was selected by the 3
Showing criteria for selection with the lowest 3
Showing criteria for selection gml was determined as the lowest 3
Showing criteria for selection were dissolved in * in a twofold manner 3
Showing criteria for selection were selected taking into account 3
Showing criteria for selection the basis set used in this work was 3
Showing criteria for selection which was defined as the 3
Showing criteria for selection were based on the * and were approved by the 3
Showing criteria for selection was considered successful when 3
Showing criteria for selection and approved by 3
Showing criteria for selection of interest a scan range of mz 1001000 was chosen the * was set at 3 106 and the 3
Showing criteria for selection and 04 m 3
Showing criteria for selection was maintained in an 3
Showing criteria for selection were defined by the 3
Showing criteria for selection is composed of a 3
Showing criteria for selection is defined as the amount 3
Showing criteria for selection 100 gml at 37 c in a 3
Showing criteria for selection for the use of 3
Showing criteria for selection in order to be able to 3
Showing criteria for selection was selected based on a previous 3
Showing criteria for selection the most appropriate 3
Showing criteria for selection details of the 3
Showing criteria for selection were selected based on previous 3
Showing criteria for selection were randomly chosen and 3
Showing criteria for selection of 22 2 c 3
Showing criteria for selection 60 5 and 12 h 3
Showing criteria for selection and 10000 gml of 3
Showing criteria for selection was as follows the initial * c held for 2 min then a 3
Showing criteria for selection of the best 3
Showing criteria for selection c for 30 s 52 c for 30 s and 72 c for 3
Showing criteria for selection those used in the 3
Showing criteria for selection was approved by the * and was conducted in accordance with the 3
Showing criteria for selection used was 10 3
Showing criteria for selection were approved by the * and were performed in accordance with the 3
Showing criteria for selection were optimized for each 3
Showing criteria for selection 2 105 cellsml were seeded in 3
Showing criteria for selection of 120 at 37 c under 3
Showing criteria for selection pose selected from the 3
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to 1331
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for 1006
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as a 876
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as the 773
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used for 501
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to 485
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for the 478
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as 473
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used as 354
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used for the 241
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to determine the 231
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as an 149
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in order to 138
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied to 129
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was performed to 124
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed to 121
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used as the 117
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to determine the 107
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is shown in 88
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used in the 87
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to calculate the 84
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used in this 76
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is based on the 74
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected due to the 73
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to determine 72
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used in the 66
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to determine the 64
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected we used the 58
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used in 55
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to analyze the 53
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used as a 52
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed for the 50
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for all 49
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was utilized to 47
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed for 45
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is used to 43
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can be used to 43
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to perform 41
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to perform the 40
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used with 40
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to obtain the 40
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used and the 40
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to calculate the 40
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to identify the 39
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to obtain 37
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was also used to 37
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used with a 36
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was conducted to 36
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was performed to determine the 35
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to identify 34
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to determine 34
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were applied to 33
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to test the 32
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used in 32
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to prepare the 31
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied for 31
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to prepare 30
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was then used to 29
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were employed to 29
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to prepare 28
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used throughout the 28
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected are used to 27
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the use of 27
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected p 005 was considered to be 27
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to record the 26
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in order to determine the 26
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to predict the 25
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to control the 24
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to generate 24
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed as the 23
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected showed that the 23
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was utilized for 22
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used as starting 22
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used in all 21
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the amount of 21
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used and 21
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied for the 21
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected on the other hand the 21
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to generate the 21
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used in order to 20
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to analyze the 20
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in the present 20
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is used for 20
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was adopted to 20
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used cite- 19
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to observe the 18
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was also used 18
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it is a 18
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected led to the 18
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to identify 17
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied as a 17
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to identify the 17
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were selected to 17
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected method was used to 17
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to examine the 17
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was possible to 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is that the 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected gml was used as a 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to examine the 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected indicated that the 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to obtain the 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were employed for 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the addition of 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it should be noted that 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to monitor the 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected on the other hand 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were also used to 16
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed to determine the 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed as a 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied to determine the 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used with the 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used at a 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is related to the 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to identify the 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to describe the 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to test the 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected due to its 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to perform the 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can be used for 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was found that 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected mg 11 mmol was used 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected g were used 15
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for further 14
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was selected to 14
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to separate the 14
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was utilized for the 14
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to analyze 14
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed in the 13
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to analyze the 13
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to construct the 13
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were utilized for 13
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is used for the 13
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were employed for the 13
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to collect 13
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was necessary to 13
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected could not be 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it is necessary to 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is used as a 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to process the 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected and used to 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were applied for the 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was adopted for 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it is important to 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was found that the 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to construct the 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to predict the 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected could be used to 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to normalize the 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it should be noted that the 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected resulted in the 12
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is used as the 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is the number of 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected m was used as a 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used as received 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were also used 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to purify the 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to prepare the 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected indicates that the 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can be used for the 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were utilized to 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was able to 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected because of the 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to prepare all 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to provide 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used instead of 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was chosen to 11
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for each 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was found to 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was considered to be 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was performed to analyze the 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to establish the 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected has been used to 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected note that the 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the ability of the 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used in all the 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to conduct 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to verify the 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected corresponds to the 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to verify the 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected refers to the 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to prepare a 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected nm was used for 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was also used for 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to record 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed as 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to generate a 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to determine the total 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to elute the 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to calculate 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to generate 10
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to perform 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in order to determine 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in this paper we 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to find the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was performed to determine 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were applied for 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to generate the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was observed that 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected and used for the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were employed as 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to separate 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to establish the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to make 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is applied to 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to maintain the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to confirm the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected 99999 was used as the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was utilized as the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to construct 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to dissolve the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is used in the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were then used to 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can also be used to 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to collect the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was then used for 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected depends on the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to predict 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was utilized as a 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used at 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to check the 9
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used with an 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected of the proposed 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was also used for the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were conducted to 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to predict the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used in this work 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to carry out 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied to calculate the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were utilized for the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected corresponded to the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to optimize the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used as an 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used instead of the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected as a result of 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected used to obtain the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was designed to 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected which was used to 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to find the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected p 005 was considered to indicate 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the ability to 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were designed to 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected are used for 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used during the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for all the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to develop the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected are able to 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were also used for 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected we were able to 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can be used as 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected indicate that the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected et al used 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to describe the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected bound to the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to calculate 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to adjust the 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used throughout 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were found to 8
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to improve the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used in a 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to express the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used without further 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to carry out the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it is worth 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected owing to the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected et al developed a 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected because of its 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was performed in order to 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in this work we 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to assess the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected resulted in a 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to perform all 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to determine whether the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it should be 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for a 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to validate the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was developed for the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied in the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected mm was used as a 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used at 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to show the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected referred to the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected there was no 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected gml was used as 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected due to the fact that 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to observe 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were prepared to 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in this case the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to compute the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied to determine 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to test the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to select 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was performed to examine the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed with a 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed as both the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected cite- was used to 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used during the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the role of 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the presence of 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was studied in 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the use of a 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to optimize the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used by 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to compute the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected are used to indicate the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used in the present 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to capture 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can be used as a 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to build the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the main advantages of 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to select the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to explore the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was adopted for the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected cite- illustrates the 7
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected that in the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to obtain 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected did not affect the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used in order to 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to build the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to construct a 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed to determine 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was conducted to determine the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected nm was used to 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected software was used for 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected served as an 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is used to calculate the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected did not show any 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to the number of 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was assumed to be 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to add 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected p 005 was considered to indicate a 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as follows 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in this work the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used and the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it is noted that 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to define the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were able to 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used with 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected contribute to the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to wash the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected used as the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to construct a 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected this means that 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to account for 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected this is the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected used to identify the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to examine the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can affect the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected this is because the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is proportional to the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected take into account the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to correct the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected nm was used as a 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for determining the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied to analyze the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to build the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed in this 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to validate the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected et al reported the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected et al found that 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used in both 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were calculated to 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to describe the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to analyze 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to construct a 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was performed to identify the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was utilized to determine the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied in this 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected m was used for 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as received 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was done to 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were adopted to 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected may be used to 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to confirm 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected chen et al 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was shown to be 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to fit the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected mm was used 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for this purpose 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected mm was used to 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to avoid 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was used for 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to confirm the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the use of the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected could be used as 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected than that of 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as follows 0 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was used to 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used from the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to achieve the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used with the 6
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used respectively 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used for * was used for 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected which is based on the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed to carry out 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to dock 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can be used in 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected there was a 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to screen 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to make the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected mm was used for 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were conducted to determine the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was also used as a 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was also employed to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected which was used for the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected used to filter the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to check the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was calculated to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected m were used for 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is employed to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the advantages of 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to acquire 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as a loading 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used according to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to generate a 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is used to describe the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can be determined by the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can be applied to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is to 1 the better the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected depended on the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected cm was used to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to represent the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to generate the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used and 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were selected to test the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected as compared to the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was also performed to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected are used as 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is represented by the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected nm was used as the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected have the same 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was also used to determine the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were chosen to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used as the initial 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to determine whether 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was considered to be the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is able to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to make a 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected demonstrated that the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the purpose of 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used throughout the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected cite- was used for 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to define 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was not possible to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were also performed to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected test was used to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to stop the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was also applied to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to define the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed for all 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected ml min1 was used 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in order to * we used the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected g were used for 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for this 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected as a result of the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was regarded as 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected used to describe the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was determined to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is caused by the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected method was employed to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected m was used for the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected which can be used to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to further 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was adopted to determine the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected cite- presents the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected equipped with a * was used for 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to acquire the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the fact that the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to build 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected gml were used as 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were adopted as 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected employed for the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected lead to a 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to create the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for performing 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to distinguish 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can then be used to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is an important 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected therefore it is necessary to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were tested to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected p 005 was used to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected suggested that the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to find out the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected used to calculate the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was regarded as the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected 99999 was used as a 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is based on the ability of 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected 10 m was used as a 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected due to the fact that the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as starting 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed to calculate the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were also used for the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected m was used 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed with a 96-h 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the difference between the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected resulting in the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected shows that the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected responsible for the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to obtain a 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was developed to 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was observed that the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was shown that the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected ml was used as a 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to establish the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected how well the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to express the 5
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected acts as a 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to establish a 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to fit the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected and were used for the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was introduced in the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to represent the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is considered as an 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to ensure 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected et al reported that 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can also be used for 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to fix the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected we used this 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is considered to be 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in order to find the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to examine 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected we found that the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to explore the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed to identify the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was performed to test the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for subsequent 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used along with the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected this means that the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as an index of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected 0001 g for 2 h resulted in the yield of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected g for 2 h resulted in the yield of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was performed to observe the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is proportional to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was performed to confirm the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was compared with that of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the purpose of the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to facilitate the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected which was used as the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed to generate the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to produce the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected can be attributed to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected solution was used 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was directly used for the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected we used an 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied as the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used in the next step without 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to elucidate the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected has the advantage of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is based on the fact that 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected 70 was used to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected followed by the * was used to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to purify the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it is based on the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as previously described 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected we also used 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in this work we used 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used for both 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were utilized in the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is used to represent 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to produce 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected used to determine the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was not used 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected et al applied 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was assumed that 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected we examined the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected et al 2012 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to build 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as the light source 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used with some 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used after 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was performed to calculate the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected has the advantages of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected could be used for 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is the ability to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to track 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected represents the number of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it may be 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected in order to identify the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied to observe 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used cite- 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to identify and 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected we note that 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected and it was found that 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected they were used to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to mimic the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected used to build the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was adopted in this 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to find 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected of p 005 was considered to be 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it can be seen that the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected from each other 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was shown that 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected proved to be 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to filter the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the amount of the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected as compared to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected revealed that the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used which 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected based on the ability of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected applied to determine the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to take 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the advantage of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to mimic the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is usually used to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected significant at p 005 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was reported that 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected mmol were used to give 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected m was used as the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected which indicated the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is designed to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected mg 012 mmol was used 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected that is the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected mgml was used as a 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected used to search for the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected could also be 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the possibility of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected et al reported a 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected higher than that of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was applied to obtain the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was referred to the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used followed by 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to reveal the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected assay was used to determine 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to present the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected used was the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected we adopted the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it is important to note that the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was served as the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was necessary to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected to represent the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to perform this 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected and was used to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected g was used to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to form 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is capable of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected therefore we used the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected focused on the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it was important to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is the main 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed and the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to create a 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the higher the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected nm was used for the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected g was used to give 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected be used to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected of the developed 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected they found that the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is used to determine 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was adopted as a 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected 99999 was used as 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected mm 5 m 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used as eluent to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to display the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected mm was used as 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected due to the high 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected method was used for 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected p 005 was used to determine 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were measured to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected there is an 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used to record the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used for all the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is commonly used to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected 2 was used to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used instead of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected is due to the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the approach of 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected et al cite- developed a 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to * as previously described cite- 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected that there was 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to read the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected 10 m was used as 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected the aim of this 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were used for a 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected it is assumed that the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected used to prepare 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed to predict the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected for the first time 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used to cover the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected we did not 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected he was used as the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected nm was used 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was used at the 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected were determined to 4
Showing reasons why a method was adopted or rejected was employed to perform the 4