Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

heat condution test fails #265

Closed
Toby-Yang opened this issue Apr 14, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

heat condution test fails #265

Toby-Yang opened this issue Apr 14, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@Toby-Yang
Copy link

has anyone tested the 1d heat conduction problem? I found PeleC failed to get accurate temperature distributions
图片1

@Toby-Yang Toby-Yang changed the title heat consution test fails heat condution test fails Apr 14, 2021
@hsitaram
Copy link
Contributor

can you give us a little more specifics for this case? Specifically about the bcnormal function you are using to impose the isothermal wall. An earlier closed issue #263 may answer some of the issues you may be facing.

@Toby-Yang
Copy link
Author

thanks for you answer. I test a new case using NoSlipWall, the temperature distributions is not agree with the results obtained with CHEMKIN package. So I think bcnormal function is not not relevant to this issue

@hsitaram
Copy link
Contributor

How are you imposing the fixed temperature at the wall without bcnormal? are you using an EB?

@hsitaram
Copy link
Contributor

Feels like an issue with transport coefficients. Can you share your case with us? What chemistry_model are you using?

@marchdf
Copy link
Contributor

marchdf commented Apr 20, 2021

Hi, two suggestions:

  • can you run with pelec.do_hydro = 0 ?
  • as a sanity check, can you print out the transport coefficients and make sure they match what you would expect for N2?

@Toby-Yang
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your suggestions. I run with pelec.do_hydro =1, then it didn’t work . Finally I found it was caused by units

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants