-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
example TAPE5 files and/or utilities to generate TAPE5 files? #13
Comments
@BenjaminTJohnson have a look at #11 (comment) and let us know if that helps clarify. no, LBLRTM and LNFL thanks for you interest in LNFL. |
@pernak18 Thanks Rick -- I'm looking for a robust example, are there some more complex example TAPE5 tables that I can download / look at? preferably with some explanation. For example, here's one I found, but I can't interpret all fields:
in particular I'm not sure what the "14" , "294.2" and "0 2500" are? Also, the values starting with " 3 ..." in the profile. |
@BenjaminTJohnson that is definitely not an LNFL |
Interesting. LNFL runs this without reporting any error, and produces TAPE3, TAPE6, and TAPE10 files. I'm happy to dig through more detailed documentation with examples (preferably). |
@kcadyper do you know why LNFL would run with an LBL @BenjaminTJohnson LNFL exists strictly to convert ASCII spectroscopy to a binary file readable to LBL, so all you need to specify is a spectral range and what molecules for which you want line parameters (there are other options, like broadening, speed dependence, and line coupling if the user wants them), not the layer information (P, T, z, and concentration) you provided because no RT is being calculated in LNFL. this is why i said the LNFL |
Okay, sorry for the confusion. I'm just trying to get an end-to-end pathway for generating transmittance profiles for typical atmospheric constituents for fast atmospheric radiative transfer (CRTM specifically). If there are precomputed inputs for LBLRTM or MonoRTM, I can skip the LNFL step... |
Hi, Ben. The LNFL release has several examples of LNFL TAPE5 files in the run_example subdirectory. We don't provide the LNFL output file (TAPE3) because it's a binary file (and thus not very portable) and very large. |
Hi, I created the following LNFL TAPE5 file (see below) and would like LNFL to create the TAPE7 file but it does not. When I run LNFL it creates the correct files except the TAPE7. $ First test TAPE5 Could you please provide some assistance what the issue might be? |
@jrmascio @kcadyper any guidance on the post from @meteorids ? i tried their |
LNFL reads the TAPE5 as a fixed format file. v1 should occupy the first ten spaces on the line, and v2 the next ten. The TAPE5 from meteorids has v1 extending into the v2 field, so LNFL reads V2 as zero. Make sure the frequencies are in the proper fields, and LNFL will run to completion. |
Thank you for your response.
I appreciate your assistance! |
Hi,
I'm working on learning LNFL (finally) and would like to see some example TAPE5 files that work with LNFL. In particular, I'm interested in examples (with angular dependence) for UV, VIS, near-IR, IR, far-IR, and MW. Ultimately this will be used for training transmittance regression coefficients in CRTM.
The old TAPE5 files (~10 years old) that we have generate an error mesage
forrtl: severe (64): input conversion error, unit 5, file /data/users/bjohnson/CRTM/LNFL/TAPE5
-- so something is wrong with the formatting.Also, do TAPE5 files for LBLRTM work with LNFL (this might be the problem is that I'm confusing the two).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: