-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
consider porting core to rescript lang #1447
Comments
@kanishka-azimi If you want to give it a try, this might help: #1422 (comment) |
Close, but I mean more for the engine / core, not just templating |
I might get approval to spend a few days providing a proof of concept of converting to rescript/reason for a few source files. Do you see any chance of such a PR getting accepted? |
@kanishka-azimi We need @zachleat's thoughts on this, as he's the core contributor and maintainer. Also, he's very busy at the moment, so the PR could sit un-merged for a while. I don't want you to do work which won't get merged. But if Zach is okay with this, go ahead. |
Don't mind if it's unmeged for a while. If it sounds acceptable, just note what you consider the least important or least changing source file(s), so I can focus there |
Cc @roddyyaga |
FYI, there is also this template engine example using reasonml: https://johnridesa.bike/acutis/ . The author uses it with eleventy's custom plugin api currently. |
Of the static site gen space, I like 11ty's philosophy. Consider adopting rescript/reason as your implementation language to get more compile time assurances. Will close immediately, just want to leave this note.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: